Hover over a bar to see number of appearances/year.
Click on a bar to jump to that year.
This person is mentioned in the diary a total of 38 times, but was not at home (N) 3 times, and was a venue (V) 13 times.
You may also examine their meals and meetings in more detail.
29 November 1817 18 December 1817 24 December 1817 (V) 26 December 1817
13 February 1818 18 March 1818 (V) 3 April 1818 10 April 1818 2 July 1818 (V) 18 October 1818 (V)
1 February 1819 22 March 1819 7 December 1819
26 January 1821 1 February 1821 18 September 1821 19 September 1821 8 October 1821 18 October 1821 (V) 27 October 1821 (NV) 29 October 1821 (V) 1 November 1821 (NV) 3 November 1821 (V) 22 December 1821 (V) 27 December 1821 (V)
20 March 1822 21 March 1822 25 May 1822 6 July 1822 (NV) 2 September 1822 30 October 1822
The strongest confirmation is that the first appearance of the name is 18 December 1817: 'Hone, three trials, Dec. 18, 19, 20', which correspond to William Hone's three trials and three acquittals on charges of blasphemy. G calls on him a few days later and their friendship begins. Further evidence includes appearances at Hazlitt's lecture (Hone published Hazlitt), and at Rodd's (book trade link). Godwin is seeking and calling on Hone in the 1820s when they are both researching C17 history in the British Museum, where there is an adv in 1828. Current research suggests that Godwin and Hone were working on and competing over the same C17 sources in the British Museum (J. McElligott (Merton)). In 1825 Godwin sups with Hone at Lamb's, and Lucas's Lamb biography has a lot on Lamb and William Hone's friendship. The last meeting is in 1832 at Rodd's. By the late 1820s Hone is in dire financial difficulties, which might explain why he almost disappears from the diary at this point. Marshall and St Clair both discuss the influence Political Justice had on Hone.
St Clair (p. 425) discusses the subscription for Hone's defence in his 1817 trials: 'Godwin himself paid something although his contribution was too small to be recorded in the printed list' and he gives as evidence for this reading the entry 'Subscription' in the diary 29 November 1817. Hone's case is certainly one to which Godwin would have been sympathetic and his decision to go and introduce himself to Hone a few days after his acquittals perhaps makes more sense if he had contributed in a small way to his defence. We have consequently coded 'subscription' as an 'other' contact for Hone.
This table lists the people this person is most frequently noted with in the diary.
Name | Number of Meetings |
---|---|
Lamb, Charles | 2 |
Lamb, Mary Anne | 2 |
O'Bryen, Dennis (O'Brien) | 2 |
Hill, (Thomas) | 2 |
Godwin, William | 1 |
Talfourd, Sir Thomas Noon (Talford) | 1 |
Richter, John | 1 |
Daniel, George (P P) | 1 |
Godwin, Mary Jane (Clairmont) (née de Vial) | 1 |
Montagu, Basil | 1 |
Botwright, | 1 |
Taylor, John | 1 |
Rosser, Henry (Blanche) | 1 |
Reid, William Hamilton | 1 |
Burney, Martin Charles | 1 |
Aldis, Lady Mary Frances (née Berridge) | 1 |
Aldis, Charles | 1 |
Rodd, Thomas (Thomas Rodd the younger) | 1 |